
Moderator Jessica DeLong, MD, assistant professor at Eastern Virginia Medical School, presented case studies of two men in their 80s with urethral stricture disease. The first was an 82-year-old with mild dementia and heart disease on anticoagulation medication with a 3 cm proximal bulbar urethral stricture. He had undergone transurethral resection of the prostate and two failed direct vision internal urethrotomies (DVIUs). The second patient was an 85-year-old hypertensive diabetic with a partially buried penis and a long anterior stricture from the meatus to the proximal bulb.
Tomas L. Griebling, MD, MPH, the John P. Wolf 33rd Degree Masonic Distinguished Professor of Urology at the University of Kansas School of Medicine, argued for suprapubic catheters for both patients.
Suprapubic catheters have some challenges, he noted, including the risk of bacterial colonization, mechanical issues, sequelae, structural injury and, in rare cases, vesicocutaneous fistula.
“However, it provides an increased level of independence and improved functional status. For many, it can be considered a palliative option, and by that I don’t mean sort of giving up, but rather as a form of therapy that really meets the patient’s goals and objectives,” Dr. Griebling said.
Sean P. Elliott, MD, MS, noted that many urologists favor endoscopic management for older patients.
He noted that self-dilation after a DVIU can delay recurrence of the urethral stricture, but it’s not a cure. For the first patient with dementia, Dr. Elliott said self-dilation may not be optimal.
“He may be more suitable for in-office dilation. On the other hand, he’s older and he has a shorter stricture, so he may tolerate self-dilation better,” he said.
Dr. Elliott favored dilation for the second patient, who he said looks to have metabolic syndrome and is at high risk for recurrence.
“Overall we’re seeing an increase in perineal urethrostomy utilization tenfold over 10 years in these patients with advanced urethral stricture disease, and it’s more likely to be in the elderly patients,” said Dr. Viers, adding that there’s also a maintenance of sexual function and better quality of life following perineal urethrostomy.
Joshua A. Broghammer, MD, FACS, associate professor of Urology at the University of Kansas Medical Center, discussed another treatment option, urethroplasty, although he said he would not advocate its use in every patient.
“I tend to tell my residents, ‘It’s not the age of the car, it’s the miles on the vehicle,’” said Dr. Broghammer, noting that it’s important to assess the overall health of each patient before deciding on a treatment approach. In the two cases considered in the session, he said health concerns such as dementia and other comorbidities were a serious consideration.
“The second patient is more challenging because he’s older, has more comorbidities, exhibits a buried penis and may have lichen sclerosus. This is a difficult repair,” he said. “His risk factors are higher for serious complications, so I probably would not offer urethroplasty in this case.”